Skip to content

Arguments

What to say when someone repeats the same point

Another half hour disappears when you answer a familiar objection as though it were new. At a club committee meeting, one member repeats a concern that has already been discussed, and the chair looks towards you for a response. Everyone else is waiting for the vote. Ignoring the concern could imply that it was never heard; rebuilding your answer rewards repetition with more meeting time. A short acknowledgement can separate understanding from agreement. The unresolved difference remains on the record, but the group does not have to replay the entire exchange before moving on.

Pick one and make it yours

The lines that work here

2 comebacks to explore.

Open “Chinese original” for the Chinese text and pinyin, or “Why it works” for the meaning and wordplay.

SarcasmLv2 · Direct#09

That’s not persistence. That’s standing still with extra confidence.

When repeating the same position is being called persistence.

Chinese original

你这不叫坚持,叫原地踏步还带点自信。

Nǐ zhè bù jiào jiānchí, jiào yuándì tàbù hái dài diǎn zìxìn.

Why it works

The line swaps the label: persistence implies progress, marching in place does not. The last clause adds confidence as the only thing still moving.

Original source unverified; not attributed to a historical author.

BoundariesLv1 · Gentle#25

We see this differently. We don’t have to decide who’s right.

When a disagreement has stopped producing anything new.

Chinese original

这件事我们看法不同,不必分出对错。

Zhè jiàn shì wǒmen kànfǎ bùtóng, bùbì fēn chū duìcuò.

Why it works

It removes the scoreboard instead of winning on it. Naming the difference and dropping the verdict ends the exchange without either person conceding.

Original source unverified; not attributed to a historical author.

Intensity depends on tone, context and who’s listening.

When not to use these

#09 · That’s not persistence. That’s standing still with extra confidence.

Do not use it when the repeated point has never received an answer; persistence may be exposing your omission.

#25 · We see this differently. We don’t have to decide who’s right.

Avoid closing the discussion if new evidence has changed the issue; a familiar conclusion can still have a new basis.

Copy this comeback

Automatic copying is unavailable. Select the text and copy it manually.

Two things not to say

Both of these look like the obvious move. Both hand the conversation back to the other person.

“Say it again and I’ll walk out.”

The threat makes the next sentence a test of your resolve. The committee now has an additional conflict to manage before it can vote.

“Let’s start from the very beginning again.”

Restarting gives the repeated objection a fresh allocation of everyone’s time. It teaches the group that repetition can indefinitely delay a decision.

The short version

Acknowledge that the point was heard without treating another repetition as a reason to restart the whole debate.

Back to Boundaries →